|
|
Ultraviolet Light Sensor * |
| Teaming | Specifications, Schedules, Budgets |
| Technical | Electronics, Optics, UV sensors & the physics of light, energy, mass, materials |
| Software | Coordination regarding signal strengths, integrity |
| Hardware | Filter design, mechanical design, layout, component selection, prototyping, mfg, testing |
|
Ultraviolet (
UV
) light is used extensively to cure (polymerize)
paints and other coatings, often in a conveyorized process.
The UV is usually produced by extremely bight "arc" lamps
also rich in visible spectra (they make a lot of white light & heat).
Most UV sensors are laboratory-grade units too sensitive
and too delicate for these processes.
They typically integrate light intensity in
mW/cm2
or
uW/cm2
(milli- or microWatts/square centimeter).
This robust, chrome sensor
(shown with a Super M.O.L.E.©* from
ECD)
can accurately measure UV light intensities in Watts/cm2 !
|
|
|
Successful products solve a problem, which in this case involves the
arc lamps that make the UV light.
They typically contain mercury and rare gasses in a quartz envelope.
In time, the mercury "plates out" on the inside of the envelope,
reflecting the UV light back into the bulb, which heats up.
The UV output decreases and the Infrared component (
IR
) rises.
The lamp still seems bright, but it's no longer doing its job.
UV curing cannot occur; the process makes "potato chips".
Industry needs a way to know when to relamp the conveyor.
The design goal was an accurate, affordable UV sensor that could
withstand the heat of the curing process and interface to an existing
datalogger through its thermocouple signal-conditioning circuit
(extremely sensitive to low-level signals).
It had to be self-powered and flat, to fit the process.
And it was to feature a "cosine response", which basically means that
it is equally sensitive to light arriving from any angle.
Ultraviolet light looks "fuzzy" to us because it begins at the blue
end of the visible spectrum and extends beyond our range of vision.
The first UV research was accomplished by the medical* community ,
which categorized it by its ability to penetrate our skin,
with names like UVA, UVB and UVC.
In time, other uses generated other names:
|
| Named Region | Wavelengths | Description |
| Microwaves | > 1,000,000nM |
Microwaves are below Light
(Longer wavelengths, lower frequencies) |
| X-rays | < 100nM |
X-rays are above Light
(shorter wavelengths, even higher frequencies) |
| Infrared | 770-1,000,000nM |
The generally-accepted Infrared range
(long wavelengths, heat) |
| Visible | 380-770nM | Visible to humans (generally) |
| Ultraviolet | 100-400nM |
The generally-accepted UV range
(short wavelengths) |
| UV-A | 315-400nM | Most common; longest wavelengths; least energy; least harmful to human tissue; most Phototherapy & tanning booths |
| UV-B | 280-315nM | Less common; mid-wavelengths; more energy; most destructive to human tissue as a practical matter; known to cause skin cancer; somewhat blocked by the Earth's Ozone Layer |
| UV-C | 100-280nM | Least common; shortest wavelengths; readily absorbed by air; forms Ozone on collision with Oxygen atoms; too scarce in Nature to do much harm; germicidal lamps; air and water purification |
| Near UV | 300-400nM (appx) | So-called "blacklight" |
| Far UV | 200-300nM (appx) | "Far" is relative to "near"; farther from the visible spectrum |
| Erythemal | 280-320nM (appx) | Another medical term |
| Germicidal | 220-300nM (appx) | Useful for killing germs |
| Ozone-producing | 180-220nM (appx) | Acrid smell, tickles your nose |
|
Electronic engineers usually discuss light by its wavelength (1 / frequency). |
|
UV
light sources for curing have strong "spectral lines" at 256nM
and 365nM (among others), and thus most UV-curable
compounds are based on chemical reactions triggered at those wavelengths.
We needed to center the unit's overall response in that passband.
We chose a sensor with good "blue" response,
designed an attenuator to scale the output, and a filter to reject the unwanted (visible) light.
There are many filter technologies from which to choose, including
thin-film depositions (which provide a tailored, "optical impedance-match")
and various glass mixtures and chemistries.
|
|
Filters are fun, and the physics of light and electricity are similar (Maxwell's equations). We needed to accept the desirable light and reject the rest, but this can be done in several ways: reflection, absorption and transmission. One idea involves "hot mirrors" that reflect the red spectra but pass the rest. Another technique is "cold mirrors", which work the opposite way. Once the signal is in the medium (usually glass or quartz), it can either be transmitted to the sensor or absorbed by the medium.
The popular
"Blue-blocker©"
sunglasses use thin-film techniques; they appear blue
because they reflect that end of the spectrum but admit the rest.
On the other hand,
red
glass is actually "everything but"; it looks red to us because it reflects
red light and accepts the remainder.
Absorption is perilous because the energy can become
heat,
which introduces inaccuracies
and drift requiring compensation.
But transmission is not simple either, because the medium can introduce attenuation, phase shifts and group delays.
And the signal may require additional "optical impedance matching" when it exits the medium.
Of course, while meeting the specifications, we also had to balance the issues
of schedule and budget.
The exact details of the sensor's construction remain proprietary
to our Client, but the sensor works extremely well with their
line of M.O.L.E.©* dataloggers.
While you're surfing, be sure to visit
ECD's website
for an update on their broad line of datalogging hardware and Statistical-Process
Control (SPC) software products.
|
| Top | Literature | Contact Us |
©Copyright 1999-2001 Barrett & Assoc. Engineering, revised 01/05/27 |